Thread: sexual freedom
View Single Post
Old 03-27-2008, 03:00 PM   #6
HappyMomma
PF Addict
 
HappyMomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 2,555
Rep Power: 1322
Reputation: 31662
HappyMomma has a reputation beyond reputeHappyMomma has a reputation beyond reputeHappyMomma has a reputation beyond reputeHappyMomma has a reputation beyond reputeHappyMomma has a reputation beyond reputeHappyMomma has a reputation beyond reputeHappyMomma has a reputation beyond reputeHappyMomma has a reputation beyond reputeHappyMomma has a reputation beyond reputeHappyMomma has a reputation beyond reputeHappyMomma has a reputation beyond repute
Children: 4 Year Old Daughter
Default Re: sexual freedom

I also noticed this sentence in his post:

Originally Posted by jtee
I understand you might not be OK with it, but I strongly believe a person's "sexuality" is innate, just like their natural hair or eye color. For me anything that is innate to a person as unique individual is not wrongbad. It just is.
People will argue about the morality of sexual perferences and behavior, and adopt beliefs that they feel are right for them. To me what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedroom (and doesn't involve children in adult sexual activities), is not morally wrong. I've know very conserative couples who firmly beleive sex between a man and woman should be in the missonary position only, and point to the bible as to why they feel other sexual activities are morally wrong. For them, that is what works, and I am OK with that, for them, but not everyone else.
__________________
The quickest way for a parent to get a child's attention is to sit down and look comfortable.
~Lane Olinghouse
HappyMomma is offline   Reply With Quote