04-23-2008, 02:00 PM
|
#9 |
| Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Lafayette, CO
Posts: 907
Children: son Jonah and daughter Ellie | Re: "The Cruelest Cut"--Fox News Story | | Even a perfectly performed circumcision does not guarantee that a person will not have more serious (beyond the mentioned above) problems in his future sexual life. Such problems as, for example, too tight (sometimes even painful) erections can be due to removal of too much foreskin and whatever left over just not enough to accommodate a normal erection are much more common than many people think since it’s nearly impossible to know for sure how much is “too much” until the penis reaches its full-grown size. Removal of too much foreskin can also lead to a shaft of the penis being hairy (it pulls skin from above to more or less accommodate an erection). Penn and Teller video called “Circumcision Bullshit”. This video is funny and therefore, takes a lot of tension off the subject while saying what needs to be said. It also explains and SHOWS non-surgical foreskin restoration. I highly recommend to take a look at this video. Yahoo Video: http://tinyurl.com/23kcyc Google Video: http://tinyurl.com/2hhud3 As any surgery, circumcision may have some very serious (even life threatening) complications. http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/complications.html http://www.cirp.org/library/complications/ . Of course, the most horrible complication is death and there were quite few of them as well (here is the most recent one http://healthblog.ctv.ca/blog/_archives/2007/5/22/2967860.html ; and I’m talking about reported deaths only; god knows what the real number of circumcision victims is. Circumcision started in North America in the Puritan 1870s as a cure for masturbation (yes, you read it right! masturbation was considered to be evil and sinful and was blamed for all sort of illnesses including blindness, paralysis and mental retardation) http://www.cirp.org/library/history/ , http://www.noharmm.org/docswords.htm , http://www.sexuallymutilatedchild.org/shorthis.htm . As late as the 1970's medical books were claiming that desensitizing the boy was good medicine as well as good morality. The idea of that, touted openly by medical scholarship with notable pride, was carefully tucked away when the sexual revolution permitted sexual pleasure. More great links: NORM - The National Organization of Restoring Men http://www.norm.org/ Mothers Who Observed Circumcision http://www.circumcision.org/mothers.htm Robert Redford's new movie Lions For Lambs is sponsoring this contest where you post a 90 second YouTube video about what you really believe in. Just Like Daddy video While this video is for artificial foreskin (and I really have mixed feelings about the product) this video is AWESOME as far as showing the process of keratinization and loss of sensitivity by using computer graphic, explaining the process in a very powerful and easy-to-understand way. To view the video, please click on the link and then go to “View The SenSlip Video” http://www.senslip.com/Photo_of_the_SenSlip_fitted.php . THE NEW ZEALANDMEDICAL JOURNAL “Effects of male circumcision on female arousal and orgasm” http://www.cirp.org/library/sex_function/bensley1/ TOP 10 ways Circumcised SEX Harms women http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/1hook_scrapes.html This website shows very clear (it explains AND also it shows very graphic videos) about how sex with circumcised penis is different than with an intact one. (there are ALOT of videos almost on every page that explains everything in very powerful and easy way). Male Circumcision Reduces Female Pleasure http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ The Nurses of St. Vincent: Saying "No" to Circumcision (short version) Nurses for the Rights of the Child http://nurses.cirp.org
Last edited by yulia : 05-21-2008 at 10:33 AM.
|
| |