Hi. I don't have kids and am not around them often, so I'm sometimes confused about my niece's behavior. Is it OK if I post questions here and get some perspective from those of you with experience?
Sue Barashi said:OK, here goes:
Can you tell me at what age I can hope for my niece to:
<LIST></LIST>
<LI>- chew with her mouth closed?</LI>
<LI>- wipe her bum well enough that she's not stinky at the end of the day?</LI>
<LI>- comply with requests/instructions from her mom with a minimum of whining, foot-dragging, outright refusal, or physical walking/running away?</LI>
That last item is especially important to me. Niece cooperates well with other adults, but when her mother (my sister) enters the picture, it's a complete Jekyll/Hyde switch. Makes for tension at family gatherings.
Thanks!
There is a lot of confusion and definition of what "consequences" means when it comes to parenting - for some, it's the same as "punishment", for some others they distinguish between natural or artificial consequences, and for some others like me, it's not the consequence that matter, it's the reparation of it.Sue Barashi said:I don't know how my sister and her husband handle disciplining my niece on regular days, but when they're visiting me or I'm visiting them, Niece experiences no consequences for bad behavior. Well, there's the verbal sparring matches with her mother, but the kid usually wins those because her mother gives up.
So my question is, is "no consequences" a currently preferred parenting style? Does this approach offer advantages for the child? for the parents
Thanks for such a quick reply. I can clarify a little.parentastic said:There is a lot of confusion and definition of what "consequences" means when it comes to parenting - for some, it's the same as "punishment", for some others they distinguish between natural or artificial consequences, and for some others like me, it's not the consequence that matter, it's the reparation of it.
But one thing is very clear across all parenting knowledge: permissive parenting - the parenting style in which children have no limits and no boundaries and can do whatever they want - is <I>not</I> working well on the long run.
Since you don't offer an actual example of a concrete "bad" behavior, I can't really comment more than that.
You did however mention verbal sparring - which can mean a lot of possibly negative verbal things from the child's parents - and you also said earlier that she seems always defiant. So to me, this is an indication of a child that is insecure in her attachment. More than that, I cannot say with the information I have so far, I don't have enough to diagnose the communication patterns in the family.
So you see, this is why I was asking what "bad behavior" means - we all have different definition of what is a "bad" or a "good", acceptable, or unacceptable behavior.Sue Barashi said:"Bad" behavior I've observed would be the verbal defiance or ignoring Mom; walking/running way when asked to come to Mom; throwing things (not hurling violently, but tossing things not meant for tossing); jumping on furniture; getting an instruction from Mom and immediately starting a different activity and demanding to finish it before doing what Mom said; interrupting conversations; or grabbing things from other people.
That's the dynamic in most households. It actually better for the mom give any good/desirable behavior positive attention rather than nagging about unwanted behavior, but this is counterintuitive to most parents.Sue Barashi said:I also hadn't thought about the nagging angle, but it makes sense: Mom nags because Niece won't cooperate, and Niece won't cooperate because Mom nags . . . <I>super fun</I>.