Hello mjgates, although you did not quote me directly, I believe your post might be a response to what I wrote in this thread. I'd like to respond to your post about "taking a soft approach".mjgates said:I couldn't disagree more with taking a soft approach when a kid is bullying and beating up other kids.
This stems from the standpoint that there are only two approach possible. That you can only respond either in a "hard" or "soft" way, essentially.
It's a <I>false dichotomy</I>.
As a parent, you can (and certainly should!) handle bullying in a firm, immediate and effective way. But that does not necessarily mean you must punish the child.
Like many parents, you may be thinking that the only way to be firm with a child is to use force or threats. In more than one parent's mind, they are assumed to both be synonyms.
I invite you to think outside the box.
If it's not okay, then why would the parent do it to their own kid?mjgates said:The punishment should fit the crime, and for a kid, bullying and beating up other kids should come along with a stiff punishment letting the kid know this is not OK.
Of course, it's easier to see this when you use things like spanking to "solve" the bullying a child is doing... because when you think of it, it's kind of evident that you hit a child for hitting.
But if you think about it, punishment in general sends the same kind of message. It's humiliating for a child. It shows the child he is powerless in front of the bigger adult. It generates feelings very similar to the feelings the child has generated for the bullied child.
It basically tells the child that the parent is a hypocrite: "Do as I say, don't do as I just did with you".
USA has the biggest ratio of people in prison ever - over a million people.
They also have the highest crime rate in all of the industrialized countries, while they hold one of the lowest standard of quality of living.
Most big-time criminals were once small criminals, who were "punished" in a way that "fit the crime" - and in the end, did it help them redeem themselves? Did it give new meaning to their life? Did it help them learn compassion and empathy and teach them to help the people who are weaker than themselves?
I think asking the question is already an answer.
If treats would work, there would be no crimes and prisons would be empty. If punishment worked, there would be no second offense.
We know how <I>that </I>works!
Punishment doesn't teach anything.
Is the parent's objective to make their child suffer for their "crimes"?
It is it to actually get them to stop their bullying?
Is it to take revenge?
Or is it to teach them empathy and compassion?
Absolutely. Kids should be held accountable from day 1.mjgates said:At what point do we start holding kids accountable for their own actions? From day 1 IMO.
The idea that a parent should do things simply because it works that way everywhere else in life is flawed. Children are not adults. Their brain aren't fully matured yet. They are developing their mind. The relationship they build with their parents is the very foundation on which is built most of the way they will see the world and interact with other people after. It's critical. This is why great care should be applied into how to reverse this trend, rather than reinforce it.mjgates said:In all walks of life, we will be punished if we break the rules, laws, etc. I don’t understand this idea of punishing shows the kids that power works. There is power everywhere they turn from parents to teachers to coaches, etc...
Parents and parental love should be unconditional. It is that love, ALWAYS present, that causes the child to seek to emulate and learn, rather than react and rebel.
Again, I invite you to consider that punishing or not punishing are not the only two alternatives. There are several techniques, involving empowerment and reparation, to handle a child's bullying in an effective and firm way, and they do not involve punishment.mjgates said:So if the bully beats up a kid at school, the school should not punish them so they do not show the kid that power works?
The school will do whatever they must, according to their rules of conduct. What is going on with parent and child is a different story. Parents have the responsibility to coach, to teach, to help kids grow up - not just to control, punish or enact revenge.mjgates said:No, the school should absolutely put whatever punishment they would hand anyone else for fighting in school.
Yes, bulling should be immediately stopped.mjgates said:While parents are searching for the root of the problem and not punishing, other kids are getting bullied and beat up. That is not acceptable, and the bullying should be stopped immediately.
And again, it's not an "either / or" situation.
You can stop the bullying from happening, immediately. Which does not necessarily involves punishment, by the way. And you can ALSO work on the root cause of the problem.
Nicolas Abesdris
Family Life Educator