kids' constant eating, research...

16th ave.

PF Addict
Jan 4, 2009
3,338
1
0
49
East Texas
<r><URL url="</s>Snacks mean U.S. kids moving toward "constant eating" - Yahoo! News<e></e></URL><br/>
<br/>
<br/>
&lt;B&gt;&lt;s&gt;&lt;/s&gt;&lt;SIZE size="3"&gt;&lt;s&gt;<SIZE size="125">&lt;/s&gt;Snacks mean U.S. kids moving toward "constant eating"&lt;e&gt;</SIZE>&lt;/e&gt;&lt;/SIZE&gt;&lt;e&gt;&lt;/e&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. children eat an average three snacks a day on top of three regular meals, a finding that could explain why the childhood obesity rate has risen to more than 16 percent, researchers said on Tuesday.&lt;br/&gt;
Children snack so often that they are "moving toward constant eating," Carmen Piernas and Barry Popkin of the University of North Carolina reported.&lt;br/&gt;
More than 27 percent of calories that American kids take in come from snacks, Piernas and Popkin reported in the journal Health Affairs. The researchers defined snacks as food eaten outside regular meals.&lt;br/&gt;
The studies will help fuel President Barack Obama's initiative to fight obesity in childhood, something Obama's wife, first lady Michelle Obama, notes could drive up already soaring U.S. healthcare costs.&lt;br/&gt;
Dr. Thomas Frieden, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, wrote a commentary calling for taxes on sugary drinks and junk food, zoning restrictions on fast-food outlets around schools and bans on advertising unhealthy food to children.&lt;br/&gt;
"Government at national, state, and local levels, spearheaded by public health agencies, must take action," he wrote.&lt;br/&gt;
Piernas and Popkin looked at data on 31,337 children aged 2 to 18 from four different federal surveys on food and eating.&lt;br/&gt;
"Childhood snacking trends are moving toward three snacks per day, and more than 27 percent of children's daily calories are coming from snacks. The largest increases have been in salty snacks and candy. Desserts and sweetened beverages remain the major sources of calories from snacks," they wrote.&lt;br/&gt;
"Children increased their caloric intake by 113 calories per day from 1977 to 2006," they added.&lt;br/&gt;
CONSTANT EATING&lt;br/&gt;
"This raises the question of whether the physiological basis for eating is becoming deregulated, as our children are moving toward constant eating."&lt;br/&gt;
In a second study in the journal, Christina Bethell of the Oregon Health and Science University in Portland and colleagues analyzed data from the 2007 National Survey of Children's Health to find the rate of obesity for children 10 to 17 rose from 14.8 percent in 2003 to 16.4 percent in 2007.&lt;br/&gt;
The percentage of children who are overweight stayed at around 15 percent, they found.&lt;br/&gt;
"While combined overweight and obesity rates appear to be leveling off, our findings suggest a possible increase in the severity of the national childhood obesity epidemic," Bethell said in a statement.&lt;br/&gt;
Parents, educators and policymakers all hold responsibility for this, Michelle Obama told the School Nutrition Association conference in Washington on Monday.&lt;br/&gt;
"Our kids didn't do this to themselves," Obama said.&lt;br/&gt;
"From fast food, to vending machines packed with chips and candy, to a la carte lines, we tempt our kids with all kinds of unhealthy choices every day."&lt;br/&gt;
Other studies have shown that obese children are more likely to stay obese as adults, and they develop chronic conditions at younger ages, burdening the healthcare system. &lt;br/&gt;
"You see kids who are at higher risk of conditions like diabetes, and cancer, and heart disease -- conditions that cost billions of dollars a year to treat," Michelle Obama said. &lt;br/&gt;
The administration has launched an initiative to tackle the issue by improving nutritional standards, getting food companies to voluntarily improve nutrition standards, help kids exercise more and educating parents. &lt;br/&gt;
The effects extend beyond health. Bethell's study found that overweight or obese children were 32 percent more likely to have to repeat a grade in school and 59 percent more likely than normal weight kids to have missed more than two weeks of school.&lt;/r&gt;
 

bssage

Super Moderator
Oct 20, 2008
6,536
0
0
58
Iowa
Do we really need more studies? Doesnt 1+1=2. If you eat more calories than you burn you will gain weight. I think thats the way that works.
 

xox.ilu.xox

PF Addict
Dec 17, 2009
2,510
0
0
37
Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada
im the queen of eating more calories than i burn lol. But i figured i prolly wont ever get rid of my post-preggo fat flobbyness post partial-hyst. so meh!

It may also depend on the kind of snacks the child is eating too! When hay has a snack, its whole-grain, and organic if we can afford to buy organic that week. Im a firm believer in you are what you eat!
 

bssage

Super Moderator
Oct 20, 2008
6,536
0
0
58
Iowa
xox.ilu.xox said:
im the queen of eating more calories than i burn lol. But i figured i prolly wont ever get rid of my post-preggo fat flobbyness post partial-hyst. so meh!
Sounds like DW. She goes up. She goes down. Never ends. The result is she always needs clothes.
 

ElliottCarasDad

PF Addict
Sep 10, 2008
2,132
0
0
59
Iowa
xox.ilu.xox said:
It may also depend on the kind of snacks the child is eating too! When hay has a snack, its whole-grain, and organic if we can afford to buy organic that week. Im a firm believer in you are what you eat!
I'm a delicious cheeseburger!
IADad said:
Book a cruise on the "SS Immeressen?"

/obscurer? ECD?
Whoa, I had to dig down for some longgivenupfordead brain cells for that one, thats an awesomely appropriate reference!
 

AmyBelle

PF Fiend
Apr 20, 2008
1,252
0
0
49
Australia
Theres nothing wrong with snacking if the child is actually hungry. I think the problem is more the food people are feeding them thats the problem.

When Bek comes home after school she's hungry, so she gets fruit, or a tub of yoghurt, or some cheese on crackers. That, by the way, is in between a healthy lunch and healthy dinner.

If however, I was feeding her fruit loops for breakfast, a bag of cookies for recess, a chocolate croissant, can of cola and a bag of burger rings for lunch, a big bowl of ice cream for asfternoon tea, frozen pizza and more cola for dinner and a chocolate bar before she goes to bed, then she's going to get really fat and unhealthy.

However, she eats 3 meals and 3 snacks a day of healthy foods and she is within a healthy weight range.
 

marjan

PF Regular
Jan 19, 2010
50
0
0
Malaysia
I guess my question would be what is constant eating? People use snack for rewards, diversion and calmer. I think cutting this out is a sign of trouble :) I would opt for "its ok for so many snacks if the content is good and healthy".
 

IADad

Super Moderator
Feb 23, 2009
8,689
1
0
60
Iowa
I think the difference is between snacking and grazing. If you have a snack, then it's a defined amount, you sit down, you eat it it's over....If you have a bowl or bag of snacks that's always one the counter, everytime, you walk by you grab another handful, then you're just building bad habits, eating for no reason, eating because it's there and you're there...so that's what I think the difference between snacking and constant eating is.