akmom said:
It is kind of pretty. It's like a cross between Tabitha and Mable. And if you don't speak English, then presumably you don't live in an English-speaking country. So what's the harm?
I personally like the creative spellings, as long as they are decipherable. I know an Emma-Lee (instead of Emily). I know a Jakob (instead of Jacob), although I find myself pronouncing it Yah-kob in my head, because that's how it's pronounced in "Creutzfeld-Jakob Disease," which I'm sure the parents DID NOT have in mind! I also think it's clever to use an X in names that traditionally start with a Z. Of course there are hideous spellings like Beonka (instead of Bianca), but I suppose it's just a matter of opinion. As long as it works phonetically.
1. All depends on context. Your language, your nationality, place where you live, and/or your religion, also the origin/meaning of the name. These things must be considered and respected.
2. In each context there are hundreds, if not thousands of "appropriate" names available. Plenty of choice? But no, there is a sort of people "oh, our baby's too special for that, therfore need to come up with something extraordinary (=absurd)". In that case, i really don't mind government or else putting a foot down. Human children deserve "human" names
3. If people really want to invent something "very extraordinary", why don't they change their own names into that?
at least they won't have to go to school and get bullied for such inventions.
4. Myself i have a name with weird spelling. And all the time i have to explain to people that Natalija is Natalia, not Nataleedjah. Annoying