Squishy said:
Nicolas, we're going to disagree on the response to this one, and I think your task is maybe to recognize the limits of your own authority here.
Granted; I do not pretend to have all the answers, and perhaps we both need to acknowledge this about each other.
Squishy said:
I agree that the symptoms are the result of the major life changes this youngster has recently experienced, but they're also coupled with some pretty bad habits she's learned before those changes, and presumably, before the onset of all these life altering events.
Perhaps for her mom, sleeping with her was not an issue.
Many parents co-sleep with their children, and what makes it a bad habit, IMO, is whether or not it interferes with the parent's sleep or with the parent's desire for intimacy / alone space.
In and of itself, there is nothing detrimental to co-sleep at 7 years old.
I do agree with you that it is important to respond to the parent's needs too; and in that sense, like I said to the OP, I am sure creative solutions can be found that both would enable the parent to get his sleep back and for the child to gain in security and trust. So in that sense, I think we might be going in the same direction.
The only part I disagree with you is the idea that her father should ignore her. I think this would be detrimental as it would add to her anxiety. On the flip side, I am not saying that keeping her in her bed is wrong. So let me amend what I said in the message above, to take your post into account:
It's not the right time to re-train her unless this can be done without impacting her already-too-low sense of security.
Squishy said:
Both need to be addressed and decoupled, so the OP needs a plan that takes both factors into consideration.....
I am glad you are saying this. I was under the impression that you were advising the OP to ignore her when she is calling out his dad (in behaviorist term, to suppress the behavior by ignoring it) which would cause her to develop more abandonment issues. As long as her deeper emotional needs are taken into account and addressed, I am comfortable with the advice. I do not believe, however, that it is possible to completely "decouple" the two issues. For the child, how her father's responds to her call-out and her emotional insecurities are inseparable. Even if she is told <U>
<I>rationally</I></U> that daddy won't answer her call-outs because she has to be in bed and it has nothing to do with abandoning her, this is still how she will feel <U>
<I>emotionally</I></U>. Her left brain memory and right brain memory still need to get into synch regarding her recent abandonment.
Squishy said:
I'm recognizing the child's feelings here as a major determinant of her behavior...I'm just seeing part of it as a learned response that can be targeted more directly as the OP is addressing more nebulous issues, like 'Security' and 'Consistency'.
It certainly is a learned response, we perfectly agree! Her actions are a direct consequences to her deeper feelings, and each time she acts on it (by calling out for dad) and dad is responding, it does reassure her a bit, hence reinforcing her conditioning to do it again.
However, the habit will be much easier to handle once the root cause is handled. It might sound nebulous to you - I do not know what your formation is - but I assure you it's a very real issue.
Squishy said:
That's what the OP wants: The sleep symptoms to go away.
Yes, it is what the OP wants, in term of behavior.
But I believe what the OP - or any parents - wants besides a specific behavior change is the <I>
understanding</I> of why a behavior happens. And once we establish that a specific behavior is a result of a real, deep and important emotional issue with his child, I would imagine the OP would want to make sure he solves that too - and perhaps even as a higher priority than the sleep issue itself. Gavin, how do you see this?
All I can tell you is that if this was in one of my workshops and a parent was presenting me with this very same situation, I would want to work with that parent to find a solution that solves <U>
both</U> issues - and I would want to make sure that the solution has no chance to deepen the emotional issue the child has.
Squishy said:
We can address a plan to eliminate the specific sleep symptoms while simultaneously addressing the obvious emotional issues, it's not an 'Either/ Or' approach.
Agreed! I just don't think that "ignoring the child's call-outs" is a way to do this, IMO.
Squishy said:
Perhaps your own bias against addressing behaviors directly prevents you from offering an approach to address that part of the child's problem.
It is possible, and I certainly would not want to diminish or ignore my own bias. However, might I point out that addressing the deeper issue - as "nebulous" as it might be, actually <I>
<U>does</U> </I>solve the resulting behavior?
As I said already several times, the child does go to sleep on her own. When the deeper issue is solved, she won't even wake up in the middle of the night.
Squishy said:
That doesn't make me a 'Behaviorist' (perish that particular thought!), it makes me responsive to both the parent's..and most importantly..the child's needs.
I certainly do not know what your background or beliefs, or what school of thoughts you follow - although I do recognize some of the professional jargon, which hints that you do have some knowledge that I see and respect.
On the flip side, you haven't responded to the fact that the OP's daughter does go to sleep in her own bed.
When she wakes up, you seem to be saying that her reasoning (whether it is instinctive or reflected) is: "I'd feel so much more comfortable in my father's bed", and then chose to go wake him up. (correct me if I am wrong). I ask the question: <I>
why does she wake up in the first place?</I> and I suggest we address this first.
There is always a need underlying a behavior.
Squishy said:
...he also needs to incorporate a plan to maintain own bed sleep thru the night.
Why is it so important? What if win-win solutions would allow the child to feel safe and secure at night, while daddy could still sleep without being bothered - wouldn't that be better?
Squishy said:
your suggestion that this "isn't the right time" is profoundly incorrect and misguided, not only is she more available to making changes now since the environment (and therefore expectations) are new, but also, allowing her to slip back into dad's room will only make it harder to remove her later on.
It's a double edged sword, Squishy. Yes, I agree: in a time of change, it is a good time to set the house rules straight from the start and establish clear boundaries. But in this case, we are talking about a child who had to live through her mom abandoning her. Not just a shared custody! This is a major situation. She needs a lot more reassurance and care right now than she needs rigid rules and limits. It's not an either/or, you are right! But it's not a 50/50 either. You must account for her emotional state.
But we can agree to disagree
And I do appreciate your feedback, by the way, I feel we are getting a lot deeper in the issue here as we discuss various points together.
If solutions can be found that allows the child to re-learn to spend the night alone, while never impacting on her feeling of security and the reliability of her father to be there for her, then sure. But never, ever, ever ignore a child. Ever.