Testing said:
She could have gone, but she had to make a big issue of it (not the school board. This had been policy forever).Your statement should read; If the GIRL had demanded nothing special that she knew would be in violation of school policy and community standards, the prom would have occurred naturally, as it has every other year.
With this kind of argument, black people would still have to sit in their own side of the buses and go to their own toilets in America. It had been "policy" for a long time too, before a black woman was courageous enough to "make a big issue out of it". It was racist to maintain the apartheid, she fought for it, and today we recognize that black people have the same right as white people and cannot be excluded from anywhere on the basis of their skin color.
So is heterosexism. This young woman can love whoever she wants; the charter of rights guarantees that one cannot discriminate against her (exclude her) on the basis of her sexual orientation, which is exactly what the prom school board is doing when they want to "force" her to dress "accordingly" to their own norm, singling her out of her fundamental right to live the same experience than her peers with her partner, regardless of her gender.
Testing said:
The school board did NOTHING different to this girl that was not applicable to every girl on the school campus. The school board did not declare that everyone but (this girl's name) could attend the prom. She could go to her prom and hook up with her paramour there. No problem. She just couldn't violate the dress code.
The bus driver excluding the black woman (unless she accept to sit in the "black" area) did NOTHING different to this black women that was not applicable to every black woman in the city, either.
The transport company did not declare that everyone but (this black women name) could get in the bus. She could go and take her bus. No problem. She just couldn't violate the
apartheid code.
I think what is astonishing to me is that you seem so entrenched in your heterosexism and your discrimination that you genuinely don't seem to see it. Seems that the law didn't agree with you either, since the organizers had to shut down the prom since they couldn't stop her from dressing the way she wanted.
To be clear, if it was not already:
In a prom, two young persons, in couple, go dance with each other, fully dressed for the occasion. These two young person did, and were prevented from it, on the basis of their sexual orientation. THAT is where the discrimination is.
Testing said:
This is an uphill battle that conservatives have already lost in this world.
White supremacists spoke just that way of their "battle" to keep black people out of "their" community.
Testing said:
I'm simply not going to be silenced here (unless they choose to ban me or something) and prevented from sharing my non-politically correct, nonmainstream view.
You are free to display your heterosexism and your discrimnatory views for the world to see. Just don't be surprised when people call you on it.
Testing said:
She could go to her prom and hook up with her paramour there. No problem. She just couldn't violate the dress code.
You do realize, as someone else pointed out above, that students get dressed in different or unique ways every time at all proms, and they are never excluded or prevented from attending? She was excluded <I>
specifically on the basis of her sexual orientation</I> because she decided to dress <I>
with man cloths</I> while being a girl. Nobody here is stupid. We perfectly know, you and I and all the readers that she was not simply excluded for violating the dress code. Let's at least be honest here.